NuScale Power (NYSE: SMR)

• The Bottom Line: NuScale Power is a pioneering public company attempting to commercialize a new generation of small, modular nuclear reactors (SMRs), representing a massive, high-risk, high-reward bet on the future of clean energy.
• Key Takeaways:
• What it is: NuScale designs and plans to sell small, factory-built nuclear reactors, which can be combined like LEGO bricks to create power plants of various sizes.
• Why it matters: If successful, NuScale could revolutionize the energy sector by providing a source of clean, reliable, and scalable baseload power, a critical component in a world moving away from fossil fuels. It presents a fascinating case study in analyzing a disruptive_technology through a value investing lens.
• How to use it: For an investor, NuScale is not a classic value play with predictable earnings; it is a speculative venture. It must be analyzed based on its technological viability, market potential, and immense execution risks, demanding an exceptionally wide margin_of_safety.

Imagine you want to build a power plant. The traditional nuclear approach is like commissioning the construction of a single, colossal cathedral. It takes over a decade, costs tens of billions of dollars, requires thousands of custom-designed parts, and involves immense construction complexity on-site. The financial and operational risks are astronomical. NuScale Power's idea is radically different. Instead of a giant cathedral, think of building with high-tech, super-safe LEGO bricks. NuScale has designed a self-contained “Power Module™”. Each module is a small, 77-megawatt nuclear reactor, roughly the size of a private jet's fuselage. These modules are designed to be mass-produced in a factory, shipped to a site by truck or rail, and then assembled. A customer could start with a 4-module plant (308 megawatts) and later expand to 6 or 12 modules as their power needs grow. This “Small Modular Reactor” (SMR) concept promises several game-changing advantages:

• Scalability: Customers can buy the power they need, not a one-size-fits-all behemoth.
• Cost & Speed: Factory production should, in theory, dramatically reduce construction costs and timelines compared to traditional nuclear plants.
• Safety: NuScale's design relies on “passive safety.” In an emergency, it uses natural forces like gravity and convection to cool the reactor, requiring no electricity or human intervention. This is a core feature designed to win public trust.
• Flexibility: SMRs can be built in locations unsuitable for giant plants, potentially powering remote communities, heavy industry, or even producing clean hydrogen.

NuScale made history by becoming the first and only SMR design to be certified by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), giving it a significant head start. However, the company is still in its infancy, with no commercial plants in operation yet. It is what investors call a “pre-revenue” company, meaning its value is based entirely on the promise of future success, not on current profits.

“The difference between successful and unsuccessful investors is not necessarily intelligence, but discipline. The discipline to stick to a strategy, to avoid being swayed by emotion, and to do your own homework.” - Seth Klarman

This quote is particularly relevant for a company like NuScale, which generates strong emotions—both excitement about its potential and fear of its risks. A disciplined, analytical approach is essential.

For a value investor, NuScale Power is a fascinating and deeply challenging company. It pushes the boundaries of traditional value investing, which typically focuses on established businesses with predictable earnings and a long track record. A value investor's primary goal is to buy a business for significantly less than its underlying, or intrinsic, worth. With NuScale, calculating that intrinsic value today is nearly impossible. Its future cash flows are a matter of educated guesswork, dependent on a long chain of “ifs”: if they can secure contracts, if they can manufacture on budget, if their plants operate as advertised, and if they can fend off competitors. Therefore, analyzing NuScale forces a value investor to confront several core principles: 1. Circle of Competence: Do you truly understand the technology, the economics of energy production, and the labyrinthine world of nuclear regulation? For most, NuScale lies far outside their circle of competence. Acknowledging this is the first step of a wise investor. 2. Investing vs. Speculation: Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing, defined investing as an operation that, “upon thorough analysis promises safety of principal and an adequate return.” Anything else, he argued, is speculation. An investment in NuScale today is, by this strict definition, speculative. It does not promise safety of principal. The risk of total loss is real. This doesn't mean it's a “bad” investment, but one must be honest about its nature. 3. The Allure of a “Story Stock”: NuScale has a powerful and compelling story: solving climate change with safe, innovative nuclear technology. Stories sell stocks, but they don't generate cash flow. A value investor must be able to separate the exciting narrative from the cold, hard business fundamentals. The biggest danger is falling in love with the story and ignoring the daunting risks. 4. The Quest for an Economic Moat: A moat is a durable competitive advantage. NuScale's potential moat is enormous. Its NRC certification is a formidable barrier to entry that took years and hundreds of millions of dollars to achieve. Its proprietary technology could also be a powerful advantage. However, this moat is not yet proven in the marketplace. It's a blueprint for a castle, not a fortified castle itself. NuScale matters because it's a test case. It forces us to ask: How do the principles of value investing apply to early-stage, world-changing technology? The answer is that the principles remain the same—insist on understanding the business, demand a margin_of_safety, and be brutally realistic about risks—but their application becomes exponentially more difficult.

Because NuScale has no history of profits, traditional valuation metrics like the P/E ratio are useless. Instead, a value investor must act more like a venture capitalist, performing deep, qualitative due diligence. This is not about precise calculation but about judging probabilities and understanding the key drivers of success or failure.

An investor considering NuScale should create a checklist to systematically analyze the business.

1. 1. The Technology & The Product:
   • Viability: Does the science hold up? The NRC certification is a massive vote of confidence, but real-world operational data is still needed.
   • Competitive Advantage: How does NuScale's design (the VOYGR™ plant) compare to competitors like GE-Hitachi's BWRX-300 or Rolls-Royce SMR? Is it cheaper, safer, easier to build?
   • Supply Chain: Can the Power Modules™ actually be manufactured at scale and on budget? Who are the key suppliers? What are the risks of bottlenecks or cost overruns?
2. 2. The Market & The Business Model:
   • Total Addressable Market (TAM): How big is the potential market? This includes replacing retiring coal plants, powering energy-intensive data centers, and providing stable grid power to complement intermittent renewables like wind and solar.
   • Unit Economics: This is the most critical question. What is the all-in cost to build a NuScale plant? What will be its Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE)—the price at which it must sell electricity to be profitable? Early projects have seen significant cost escalations. The failure of its flagship project with the Carbon Free Power Project (CFPP) in Utah due to rising costs is a major red flag that must be understood.
   • Sales Pipeline: Who are the potential customers? How firm are the commitments? A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is not a binding contract. Look for firm orders with financial commitments.
3. 3. Financial Health:
   • Cash Burn Rate: How much cash is the company spending each quarter?
   • Balance Sheet: How much cash does it have on hand? Does it have significant debt?
   • Capital Needs: The company will almost certainly need to raise more money before it becomes profitable. This means future shareholder dilution is a near certainty. How much more capital will be needed and on what terms?
4. 4. Management & Ownership:
   • Leadership Team: What is the track record of the CEO and the senior engineering and financial officers? Do they have experience delivering complex, multi-billion-dollar energy projects?
   • Major Shareholders: Who are the institutional backers? Fluor Corporation, a giant engineering and construction firm, has been a long-time majority owner. Is their vision aligned with long-term, individual shareholders?
   • Incentives: How is management compensated? Are they rewarded for long-term value creation or short-term stock price bumps?

After going through this checklist, the goal is to form an investment thesis—a clear, written-out argument for why this is or is not a good investment at the current price. Your thesis for NuScale will be built on a foundation of assumptions about future events. For example: “I believe NuScale is a good investment because I expect them to secure two firm contracts by 2026, achieve a target LCOE of $80/MWh, and I believe the market is underestimating the demand from data centers. Even after accounting for 50% future dilution, my discounted cash flow analysis, using very conservative assumptions, suggests an intrinsic_value of X, which is double the current stock price.” Conversely, a bear thesis might sound like: “While the technology is promising, the cancellation of the CFPP project demonstrates that the company cannot yet control costs. I believe competition from other SMRs and advanced renewables will compress margins. The risk of project failure and further shareholder dilution is too high, and the current stock price does not offer an adequate margin_of_safety for these risks.” For a value investor, the conclusion will likely be that the range of potential outcomes is simply too wide to make a confident valuation. The investment thesis then becomes one of risk management: either avoid the stock entirely or allocate a very small, speculative portion of a well-diversified portfolio to it, fully prepared to lose the entire amount.

Let's imagine two investors, “Speculator Sally” and “Value Investor Victor,” both looking at NuScale Power after it appears in a news headline about “The Future of Energy.”

This example illustrates the core difference. Sally's actions were driven by emotion and narrative (FOMO - Fear Of Missing Out). Victor's actions were driven by disciplined analysis and a focus on risk_management. For a company like NuScale, Victor's approach is the essence of value investing.

A balanced view requires understanding both the optimistic and pessimistic arguments.

• First-Mover Advantage: NuScale's NRC design certification is a huge, expensive, and time-consuming hurdle that competitors have yet to clear in the U.S. market.
• Massive Addressable Market: The global push for decarbonization, combined with the soaring energy needs of AI and data centers, creates a potentially trillion-dollar market for reliable, carbon-free power.
• Government Tailwinds: Policies like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in the U.S. provide significant tax credits and financial support for new nuclear projects, improving their potential economics.
• Solves Renewable Energy's Flaw: Unlike wind and solar, which are intermittent, nuclear provides 24/7 baseload power, making the entire energy grid more stable and reliable.
• Scalable and High-Margin Model: If NuScale can perfect its factory-manufacturing process, it could achieve a high-margin, repeatable business model, selling modules and long-term service contracts globally.

• Unproven Economics: This is the single biggest risk. The cancellation of the CFPP project because its projected cost of electricity became uncompetitive is a stark warning. There is no proof yet that SMRs can be built on time and on budget to produce affordable power.
• Execution Risk: Moving from a certified design to a fully operational, profitable fleet of power plants is a monumental task fraught with potential delays, supply chain issues, and cost overruns.
• Intense Competition: NuScale is not alone. Dozens of companies, including industrial giants like General Electric, Rolls-Royce, and Westinghouse, are developing SMRs. The competitive landscape will be fierce.
• Long Timelines & Capital Needs: It takes years to sign a customer, get site approval, and build a plant. During this time, NuScale will be burning cash. It will need to raise more capital, which will dilute the ownership stake of current shareholders.
• Public and Political Headwinds: While improving, public perception of nuclear energy can be a significant obstacle. A single accident anywhere in the world could set the entire industry back decades.

• economic_moat
• intrinsic_value
• margin_of_safety
• circle_of_competence
• speculation
• disruptive_technology
• risk_management
• long_term_investing