Non-Performing Loans (NPLs)

• The Bottom Line: A Non-Performing Loan (NPL) is a loan that has gone bad, and for an investor in bank stocks, it's the single most important warning sign of poor health and future losses.
• Key Takeaways:
• What it is: An NPL is simply a loan where the borrower has fallen significantly behind on their payments, typically for 90 days or more.
• Why it matters: High NPLs are a direct hit to a bank's profitability and stability. They reveal poor past lending decisions and can wipe out shareholder equity, eroding the bank's intrinsic_value.
• How to use it: Investors must analyze the NPL Ratio (what percentage of loans are bad) in conjunction with the Provision Coverage Ratio (how much the bank has prepared for these losses).

Imagine you own a small apartment building. Your tenants pay you rent every month. This rental income is the lifeblood of your business. Now, what happens if a tenant in one of your apartments stops paying rent? For one month, it's a concern. For two months, it's a problem. By the third month, that apartment is no longer “performing” its job of generating income for you. It has become a non-performing asset. A Non-Performing Loan (NPL) is the exact same concept, but for a bank. A bank's primary business is renting out money (making loans) and collecting rent (interest and principal payments). A loan is an asset on a bank's balance sheet. When a borrower—whether it's an individual with a mortgage or a business with a corporate loan—stops making their scheduled payments for an extended period (usually 90 days), that loan is reclassified from a healthy, income-generating asset to a Non-Performing Loan. In the simplest terms, an NPL is a soured loan. It’s a promise of repayment that has been broken. For the bank, it's a headache that represents a potential loss of its original capital, a disruption to its cash flow, and a clear sign that a past lending decision was a mistake.

“Rule No. 1: Never lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget rule No. 1.” - Warren Buffett
¹⁾

For a value investor analyzing a company like Coca-Cola, you might focus on brand strength and pricing power. When analyzing a bank, your focus must shift to the quality of its assets—and a bank's primary asset is its loan book. NPLs offer a crucial, unfiltered window into the true quality of that loan book and the competence of the bank's management. Here's why NPLs are a cornerstone of bank analysis for a value investor:

• A Report Card on Risk Management: A consistently low NPL ratio is the hallmark of a disciplined, conservative lending culture. It tells you that management prioritizes making sound loans over chasing reckless growth. Conversely, a high or rapidly rising NPL ratio is a giant red flag. It screams that the bank was probably handing out money too freely during the good times, and now the consequences are coming home to roost. It’s a direct reflection on the quality and integrity of management.
• Direct Threat to Intrinsic Value: A bank's intrinsic_value is derived from its ability to generate sustainable earnings from its assets. NPLs attack this value from two directions. First, they stop generating income. Second, the bank will likely have to write-off a portion (or all) of the loan, causing a direct loss that reduces its book_value and future earnings power.
• Shrinking the margin_of_safety: A bank with a mountain of bad loans has a paper-thin margin_of_safety. Banks operate with high leverage, meaning a small percentage of losses on their total assets can completely wipe out their shareholder equity. A bank with a clean loan book can withstand an economic downturn. A bank weighed down by NPLs is brittle and can shatter at the first sign of trouble. As a value investor, you seek resilience, not fragility.
• Staying Within Your circle_of_competence: Banking can be an intimidatingly complex industry. Financial statements are often dense and opaque. However, the NPL ratio is a relatively simple and powerful metric that cuts through the noise. By focusing on NPLs and their associated metrics, an investor can make a reasonably informed judgment about a bank's health without needing a Ph.D. in finance.

In short, while other investors might get excited about a bank's flashy marketing or short-term earnings growth, the value investor is in the basement, inspecting the foundation. NPLs tell you whether that foundation is made of solid rock or crumbling sand.

Looking at the raw number of NPLs in dollar terms isn't very useful. A giant bank will naturally have more NPLs than a small community bank. To make sense of the data, you must use two key ratios. A savvy investor always looks at them together.

1. The NPL Ratio: This tells you what percentage of the bank's total loan portfolio has gone sour. `NPL Ratio = (Total Value of Non-Performing Loans / Total Gross Loans) * 100%` 2. The NPL Coverage Ratio (or Loan Loss Provision Coverage Ratio): This tells you how well the bank is prepared for the inevitable losses from its NPLs. It measures the size of the bank's rainy-day fund (its loan_loss_provision) relative to the size of its identified problems (its NPLs). `NPL Coverage Ratio = (Loan Loss Provisions / Total Value of Non-Performing Loans) * 100%`

Thinking about these ratios is like a doctor evaluating a patient. The NPL Ratio tells you how sick the patient is. The NPL Coverage Ratio tells you how much medicine they have on hand to treat the illness.

• NPL Ratio:
  • Low is good: A ratio below 1% is generally considered excellent, indicating a very healthy and disciplined lender.
  • Moderate is acceptable: Ratios between 1% and 3% are common, especially depending on the economic cycle. This warrants monitoring but isn't necessarily a panic signal.
  • High is a major warning: A ratio creeping towards 5% or higher is a significant red flag. It suggests systemic problems in the bank's underwriting standards or severe stress in its operating economy.
• NPL Coverage Ratio:
  • High is good: A ratio above 100% is extremely conservative and a sign of strength. It means the bank has set aside more than enough funds to cover all of its identified bad loans.
  • Moderate is common: Ratios between 50% and 100% are typical. It shows the bank is actively provisioning for losses.
  • Low is dangerous: A ratio below 50% is a serious concern. It implies the bank is under-provisioned and is not adequately prepared for the losses it will have to take. This means future earnings will likely take a big hit as they are forced to “catch up” on their provisions.

The Golden Rule: Analyze Them Together Never look at one ratio in isolation. The combination of the two tells the real story.

Let's compare two hypothetical banks: RockSolid Bank and GoGo Growth Bank. Both have reported the same net profit this year, and GoGo Growth is trading at a slightly cheaper valuation, making it look attractive at first glance. A value investor digs into their financial reports to look at asset quality.

Analysis:

• RockSolid Bank fits “The Fortress” profile. Its NPL ratio is an excellent 1.0%. It has a very clean loan book. Furthermore, its coverage ratio is a whopping 120%. This tells you that management is not only effective at making good loans, they are also incredibly conservative and have already set aside more than enough money to cover every single dollar of their identified bad loans. This bank is built to withstand a storm.
• GoGo Growth Bank fits “The Disaster” profile. Its name gives away its strategy: it grew its loan book aggressively. But this growth came at a steep price. A 6.0% NPL ratio is alarming. It means that for every $100 they lent out, $6 has gone bad. Worse, their coverage ratio is a terrifyingly low 40%. They have $7.2 billion in recognized bad loans but have only prepared for $2.88 billion of them. This leaves a $4.32 billion gap that will almost certainly have to be filled by future earnings.

The superficial investor, looking only at this year's profit, might be tempted by GoGo Growth. The value investor sees the enormous, unprovisioned risk hiding in plain sight and understands that RockSolid Bank, despite potentially slower growth, is an infinitely superior long-term investment due to its pristine asset quality and prudent management.

(As an analytical tool)

• Clarity: The NPL ratio is a simple, direct, and internationally recognized measure of a bank's asset quality. It cuts through financial jargon.
• Predictive Power: A rising trend in NPLs is one of the most reliable leading indicators of future earnings trouble and potential dividend cuts for a bank.
• Management Scorecard: It provides an excellent, objective measure of management's underwriting skill and risk discipline over the long term.

• Lagging Indicator: By the time a loan is officially classified as an NPL (90+ days past due), the economic damage has already begun. It tells you where the bank has been, not necessarily where it's going.
• Subject to Manipulation: A desperate bank can sometimes delay the recognition of NPLs through a practice called “extend and pretend” or “evergreening,” where they restructure a troubled loan to make it appear current. This can hide problems temporarily.
• Context is Crucial: A 3% NPL ratio might be excellent for a bank specializing in unsecured consumer credit during a recession, but terrible for a bank focused on prime mortgages during a boom. You must compare a bank's NPLs to its direct peers and its own historical levels.
• Economic Cycles: NPLs will naturally rise for all banks during a recession and fall during an expansion. The key is to find banks whose NPLs rise less than their competitors' during the bad times.

• loan_loss_provision
• book_value
• return_on_equity_roe
• margin_of_safety
• circle_of_competence
• risk_management
• leverage