Show pageOld revisionsBacklinksBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ======Sortino Ratio====== The Sortino Ratio is a powerful tool for measuring an investment's risk-adjusted return. Think of it as a more refined version of the well-known [[Sharpe Ratio]]. While the Sharpe Ratio penalizes all volatility (both ups and downs) equally, the Sortino Ratio cleverly focuses only on the "bad" kind of volatility—the downside risk that actually loses you money. It answers a crucial question for any investor: "For every unit of bad risk I took, how much excess return did I get?" It achieves this by measuring an investment's performance relative to the volatility of its negative returns, or any returns that fall below a specific target. This makes it an especially useful metric for investors who, quite reasonably, care a lot more about avoiding losses than they do about smoothing out big gains. ===== The Sharpe Ratio's Smarter Cousin? ===== Imagine two fund managers, Alice and Bob. Both achieved a 15% annual return over five years. The classic Sharpe Ratio might give them similar scores if their overall volatility, or [[Standard Deviation]], was the same. But what if a closer look revealed a critical difference? * **Alice's fund** had some wild upward swings, occasionally jumping 10% in a month, but rarely had a down month. * **Bob's fund** was a gut-wrenching rollercoaster, with dramatic peaks //and// deep troughs, including several months with significant losses. The Sharpe Ratio treats Alice's thrilling upside jumps as "risk" just like it treats Bob's painful plummets. This is where the Sortino Ratio steps in. It ignores the "good" volatility of Alice's fund and focuses solely on the harmful, downside volatility that characterized Bob's fund. By doing so, it would give Alice a much higher score, correctly identifying her as the superior manager for an investor focused on capital preservation. It doesn't punish a strategy for producing unexpectedly high positive returns, which is a flaw many investors find in the Sharpe Ratio. ===== How It Works: The Nitty-Gritty ===== ==== The Formula Unpacked ==== While you'll rarely need to calculate it by hand, understanding the components is key. The formula is: **Sortino Ratio = (Rp - Rf) / σd** Let's break that down: * **Rp (Portfolio Return):** This is simply the return your investment generated over a specific period. * **Rf ([[Risk-Free Rate]]):** This is your baseline—the return you could have earned on a virtually risk-free investment, like a U.S. [[Treasury Bill]]. The term (Rp - Rf) gives you the "excess return" you earned for taking on risk. * **σd ([[Downside Deviation]]):** This is the magic ingredient. Instead of using standard deviation (which measures all price swings), it calculates the standard deviation of //only// the returns that fall below a required rate of return. This target is often the risk-free rate, but an investor could set their own [[Minimum Acceptable Return]] (MAR), like 0% or the rate of inflation. ==== Interpreting the Number ==== The interpretation is straightforward: **higher is better**. A higher Sortino Ratio means you are getting more return for each unit of "bad" risk you take on. * **Below 1.0:** Not great. The investment's excess returns don't compensate for the downside risk it has taken. * **1.0 to 2.0:** Generally considered good. * **2.0 to 3.0:** Considered very good. * **Above 3.0:** Excellent. Comparing the Sortino and Sharpe ratios for the same fund can be very revealing. A fund with a much higher Sortino Ratio than its Sharpe Ratio likely experiences significant positive volatility, which is a feature, not a bug! ===== A Value Investor's Perspective ===== The Sortino Ratio resonates deeply with the [[Value Investing]] philosophy. It aligns perfectly with [[Warren Buffett]]'s two famous rules of investing: "Rule No. 1: Never lose money. Rule No. 2: Never forget Rule No. 1." Value investors are obsessed with protecting their principal. Their entire approach, built on concepts like buying with a [[Margin of Safety]], is designed to mitigate the risk of permanent capital loss. The Sortino Ratio is the quantitative expression of this mindset. It directly measures how well an investment or fund manager has succeeded at Rule No. 1 by focusing exclusively on downside risk. While value investors ultimately make decisions based on the [[Intrinsic Value]] of a business, the Sortino Ratio is an excellent secondary tool for evaluating the performance of portfolio managers who claim to be following a value-oriented, risk-averse strategy. ===== Limitations and Considerations ===== No single number tells the whole story. When using the Sortino Ratio, keep these points in mind: * **Past performance is no guarantee:** The ratio is backward-looking. A manager with a great historical Sortino Ratio could have just been lucky or might change their strategy. * **It's all relative:** The ratio is most useful for comparing similar investments (e.g., two large-cap value funds) over the same time period. * **Data can be manipulated:** The choice of the Minimum Acceptable Return (MAR) and the time period measured can significantly influence the result. Ultimately, the Sortino Ratio is a superior alternative to the Sharpe Ratio for most investors. It provides a more realistic and intuitive picture of risk, helping you find strategies that not only grow your capital but, more importantly, protect it.