Show pageOld revisionsBacklinksBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ======SG&A-to-Revenue Ratio====== The SG&A-to-Revenue Ratio (also known as the SG&A/Sales Ratio) is a key financial metric that measures a company's operating efficiency. It tells you what percentage of each dollar in sales is consumed by overhead costs. [[SG&A]] stands for `[[Selling, General & Administrative Expenses]]`—these are the costs of running the business that aren't directly tied to producing a product or service. Think of salaries for the HR and accounting teams, the CEO's bonus, rent for the head office, and the advertising budget for that catchy new jingle. Essentially, this ratio reveals how lean or bloated a company's operations are. For a [[Value Investing]] practitioner, a low and stable (or better yet, decreasing) ratio is often a beautiful sight, signaling a well-managed company that keeps a tight rein on its expenses, leaving more profit for shareholders. ===== Why It Matters for Value Investors ===== Imagine two coffee shops on the same street, both selling a latte for $4 and generating the same daily sales. Shop A spends a fortune on celebrity endorsements, a lavish headquarters, and a huge administrative staff. Shop B is frugal, relying on word-of-mouth and running a tight ship. The SG&A-to-Revenue ratio would immediately expose this difference. Shop B, with its lower ratio, is far more profitable and resilient. This is the core of why this ratio is a gem for investors. A company with a durable cost advantage over its peers has a powerful `[[Competitive Advantage]]`, or what Warren Buffett famously calls a `[[Moat]]`. This efficiency means: * More cash is left over after paying the bills. * This extra cash can be used to reinvest in the business, pay down debt, or return to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. * The company can better withstand price wars or economic downturns. In short, a low SG&A-to-Revenue ratio is a strong indicator of a high-quality, efficient business that knows how to turn [[Revenue]] into real profit. ===== Breaking Down the Ratio ===== ==== The Formula in Detail ==== Calculating the ratio is refreshingly simple. You can find both numbers on a company's `[[Income Statement]]`. The formula is: **SG&A-to-Revenue Ratio = SG&A Expenses / Total Revenue** For example, let's say "Growth Gadgets Inc." reported the following for the year: * Total Revenue: $500 million * SG&A Expenses: $100 million Its ratio would be: `$100 million / $500 million = 0.20` or **20%** This means for every dollar of sales, Growth Gadgets Inc. spends 20 cents on its selling, general, and administrative functions. ==== What's a 'Good' Ratio? ==== There is no magic number that is universally "good." //A 'good' ratio is entirely dependent on the industry.// * **High-Ratio Industries:** Companies in sectors like software or pharmaceuticals often have very high SG&A ratios. This is because their major costs are not raw materials, but rather massive spending on research, development (often included in SG&A or listed separately), and marketing to get their products to market. A 30-40% ratio might be perfectly normal here. * **Low-Ratio Industries:** In contrast, a discount retailer or a utility company should have a very low ratio. Their business model is built on high volume and razor-thin margins, so controlling overhead is critical for survival. A ratio of 10% might be considered high in this context. The key is not to compare a software company to a supermarket. Instead, an investor should focus on two things: * **Trend Analysis:** How has the company's own ratio changed over the past 5-10 years? * **Peer Comparison:** How does its ratio stack up against its direct competitors? ===== Reading the Tea Leaves: What the Trend Tells You ===== ==== A Decreasing Ratio: The Gold Standard ==== When a company's SG&A-to-Revenue ratio is consistently falling over time, it's a fantastic sign. It often indicates the presence of `[[Economies of Scale]]`. As the company grows larger, its sales are increasing faster than its overhead costs. Management is successfully leveraging its size, and this efficiency gain drops straight to the bottom line, boosting the `[[Operating Margin]]`. This is the hallmark of a scalable and powerful business model. ==== An Increasing Ratio: A Red Flag ==== An upward-trending ratio warrants a closer look. It could be a sign of trouble: * **Sloppy Management:** The company might be getting inefficient and losing control of its costs. * **Fiercer Competition:** It may be forced to spend much more on advertising and promotions just to maintain its market share. * **Diseconomies of Scale:** The business has become too complex to manage effectively, and bureaucracy is driving up costs faster than revenue. However, an increasing ratio isn't //always// a bad thing. A company might be making a strategic, short-term investment in a major marketing campaign for a new product launch. The key is to check management's explanation in `[[Annual Reports]]` or on `[[Earnings Calls]]` to understand the story behind the numbers. ===== Putting It Into Practice: A Value Investor's Checklist ===== Before you make a decision based on this ratio, run through this simple checklist: * **Compare Apples to Apples.** Never compare the SG&A ratio of a tech company to that of a steel manufacturer. Always stay within the same industry to get a meaningful comparison. * **Watch the Trend, Not the Snapshot.** A single year's ratio tells you little. Look at the trend over at least five years to understand if the company is becoming more or less efficient. * **Check the Context.** A high SG&A ratio isn't necessarily bad if it's supported by a very high `[[Gross Margin]]`. A software company might have a high SG&A, but if its `[[Gross Profit]]` on each sale is 90%, it can still be incredibly profitable. Always look at the SG&A ratio in concert with other profitability metrics. * **Listen to Management.** Read the company's financial reports. Does management talk about cost control? Do their actions align with their words? A management team that is transparent about its expenses is often one you can trust.