raw_material_costs

This is an old revision of the document!


Raw Material Costs

  • The Bottom Line: Understanding a company's raw material costs is fundamental to gauging its profitability, competitive strength, and long-term resilience against inflation.
  • Key Takeaways:
  • What it is: The direct cost of the basic substances and components a company uses to create its products, such as steel for a car or cocoa beans for a chocolate bar.
  • Why it matters: These costs directly impact a company's gross_margin and profitability, revealing its vulnerability to commodity price swings and supply_chain disruptions.
  • How to use it: Analyze its trend as a percentage of revenue and compare it against competitors to assess a company's operational efficiency and, most importantly, its pricing_power.

Imagine you're a baker famous for your delicious sourdough bread. To bake a loaf, you need flour, water, salt, and yeast. The money you spend on those ingredients is your raw material cost. It's the foundational expense of creating your product. If the price of high-quality flour suddenly doubles, your ability to make a profit on each loaf is immediately threatened. Now, scale that idea up to a massive, publicly traded company.

  • For Ford Motor Company, raw materials are the steel for the chassis, the aluminum for the engine block, the rubber for the tires, and the plastics for the dashboard.
  • For The Hershey Company, it's the cocoa beans, sugar, and milk that form the heart of their chocolate bars.
  • For Intel, it's the highly purified silicon wafers used to manufacture microchips.

Raw material costs are the expenses a company incurs to acquire the fundamental inputs for its production process. They are a primary component of a crucial line item you'll find on a company's income_statement: the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). While COGS also includes other direct costs like factory labor, raw materials often represent the largest and most volatile piece of the puzzle. These costs are the business world's equivalent of the ground beneath your feet. When the ground is stable and predictable, building a profitable enterprise is straightforward. But when it's prone to earthquakes—like sudden spikes in the price of oil, copper, or wheat—only the most well-built companies can withstand the shock. For an investor, analyzing these costs isn't just an accounting exercise; it's a stress test of the company's entire business model.

“Watch the costs and the profits will take care of themselves.” - Andrew Carnegie

A value investor seeks to buy wonderful businesses at fair prices. The “wonderful” part of that equation is directly tied to a company's long-term profitability and resilience. Scrutinizing raw material costs is essential to this analysis for several key reasons.

  • A Window into Profitability and Intrinsic Value: The single biggest determinant of a company's profitability is the spread between what it costs to make a product and the price it can sell it for. Raw material costs are at the very beginning of that equation. A company with low, stable, or declining raw material costs has a powerful tailwind boosting its profits. Conversely, a company at the mercy of volatile commodity prices will see its earnings swing wildly, making it incredibly difficult to confidently estimate its long-term intrinsic_value. Uncertainty is the enemy of the value investor, and volatile input costs breed uncertainty.
  • The Ultimate Test of an Economic Moat: A company's true competitive advantage, or “moat,” is never more apparent than when its input costs rise. A weak company in a commodity business—say, a generic chicken producer—has little choice but to absorb the higher cost of grain, crushing its profits. It has no pricing_power. A truly great company, like Coca-Cola, can pass on the higher cost of sugar or aluminum to its customers with little fear of them switching to a different brand. Why? Because people aren't just buying flavored sugar water; they're buying “Coke.” The brand is the moat. By observing how a company's gross_margin behaves during periods of commodity inflation, you can get a real-world measure of its pricing power.
  • Informing the Margin of Safety: The father of value investing, Benjamin Graham, taught that the margin_of_safety is the central concept of investment. If you've identified a business whose raw material costs are highly volatile and unpredictable (e.g., an airline and its exposure to jet fuel prices), your valuation of that business must account for this risk. You would demand a much larger discount to your estimated intrinsic value—a wider margin of safety—before investing. In contrast, a business with predictable and stable input costs, like a software-as-a-service (SaaS) company, is inherently less risky in this regard, potentially justifying a smaller margin of safety.
  • Evaluating Management Skill: How management handles the challenge of raw material costs separates the brilliant capital allocators from the merely average. Do they strategically use long-term contracts to lock in prices? Do they use hedging instruments wisely to smooth out volatility? Do they vertically integrate to control their supply? Or are they constantly surprised by market swings and making excuses on earnings calls? A deep dive into their strategy for managing input costs reveals a great deal about their foresight and operational expertise.

You won't find a line item labeled “Raw Material Costs” on the income statement. It's a bit of detective work. Here's how to approach it.

The Method: Where to Find the Data and What to Do

  1. Step 1: Start with the Income Statement. Locate the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), sometimes called “Cost of Revenue” or “Cost of Sales.” This is your starting point. Calculate COGS as a percentage of total Revenue for the past 5-10 years to see the overall trend in input costs.
  2. Step 2: Dive into the Annual Report (10-K). This is where the real insights are. The most valuable section is the Management's Discussion & Analysis (MD&A). Use “Ctrl+F” to search for terms like “raw material,” “commodity,” “input costs,” “hedging,” and the names of specific key ingredients (e.g., “steel,” “cocoa,” “lithium”). Management is required to discuss factors that could materially affect their business, and volatile input costs are a prime example.
  3. Step 3: Read the Footnotes. The footnotes to the financial statements can also provide clues, particularly regarding inventory valuation methods (like LIFO vs. FIFO)1) and details on derivative contracts used for hedging.
  4. Step 4: Listen to Earnings Calls. Analysts on quarterly earnings calls frequently ask management directly about the impact of raw material prices. The answers can provide timely and candid insights into how the company is coping with market changes.

Interpreting the Analysis: Key Questions to Ask

Once you have the information, you need to interpret it through a value investor's lens. Ask yourself:

  • What is the Trend? Is COGS as a percentage of sales consistently rising? This could be a major red flag, indicating that the company is losing its battle against cost inflation and its margins are eroding. A stable or declining percentage is a sign of strength.
  • How Volatile are the Margins? Look at the gross_margin (Gross Profit / Revenue). Does it swing wildly from year to year? If so, it suggests the company is highly sensitive to commodity prices and lacks the pricing power to smooth out its earnings. Value investors prize predictability.
  • Where is the Pricing Power? Compare the company's gross margin trend with a historical price chart of its key raw material. For example, if the price of copper spiked in 2021, what happened to the gross margin of a wire and cable manufacturer? If the margin held steady, it's powerful evidence of pricing power. If it plummeted, the company's moat is weak.
  • How Does it Stack Up to Competitors? Compare the gross margins of your target company with its closest rivals. A company that consistently maintains higher gross margins likely has a cost advantage, whether through superior purchasing power (buying in massive bulk), more efficient processes, or better technology.

Let's compare two fictional coffee companies facing a sharp increase in the price of raw arabica coffee beans.

  • “Morning Ritual Inc.”: A premium coffee brand with a powerful, cult-like following, famous for its unique roasts and upscale cafe experience. They are the “Apple” of coffee.
  • “Generic Joe's Coffee”: A massive supplier of private-label coffee for supermarkets. Their product is a commodity, and they compete almost entirely on price.

Now, let's assume the price of coffee beans doubles in Year 2.

Morning Ritual Inc. (Strong Moat)
Year Year 1 Year 2 Analysis
Revenue $100 Million $115 Million Raised prices by 15% due to brand loyalty
Raw Coffee Bean Cost $20 Million $40 Million Cost of beans doubled
Other COGS $10 Million $11 Million Slight increase
Total COGS $30 Million $51 Million
Gross Profit $70 Million $64 Million
Gross Margin 70.0% 55.7% Margin compressed, but still highly profitable due to ability to raise prices.
Generic Joe's Coffee (No Moat)
Year Year 1 Year 2 Analysis
Revenue $100 Million $100 Million Could not raise prices due to intense competition
Raw Coffee Bean Cost $40 Million $80 Million Cost of beans doubled, they use more beans for less revenue
Other COGS $20 Million $21 Million Slight increase
Total COGS $60 Million $101 Million
Gross Profit $40 Million -$1 Million
Gross Margin 40.0% -1.0% Margin completely wiped out. The business became unprofitable.

The Takeaway: This simple example reveals everything. Morning Ritual, with its strong brand moat, was able to pass on a significant portion of the cost increase to its loyal customers. While its margin took a hit, the business remained fundamentally sound and highly profitable. Generic Joe's, however, was destroyed. It had no brand, no pricing power, and was completely at the mercy of the commodity market. As a value investor, your job is to find the “Morning Rituals” of the world and avoid the “Generic Joe's.”

  • Direct Link to Profitability: This analysis provides a clear, unfiltered view of a company's core operational costs and its direct impact on gross_margin, the purest measure of a company's production profitability.
  • Reveals Competitive Advantages: How a company sources, manages, and responds to changes in raw material costs can uncover deep-seated competitive advantages like superior scale, logistical efficiency, or the all-important pricing_power.
  • A Good Proxy for Management Quality: Proactive and transparent management of input costs is often a hallmark of a well-run company. It demonstrates foresight, discipline, and a focus on long-term shareholder value.
  • Lack of Transparency: This is the biggest challenge. Companies often lump raw material costs into the broader COGS figure. It requires the detective work outlined above to piece together the story from the MD&A and other disclosures.
  • Complexity of Hedging: Companies may use complex financial instruments (futures, options, swaps) to hedge against price swings. While this can reduce short-term volatility, it doesn't eliminate the risk and can introduce its own complexities (like counterparty risk) that are difficult for an average investor to fully assess.
  • Misinterpreting Vertical Integration: A company might own its raw material sources (e.g., a paper company owning the forest). While this can stabilize costs, it also requires massive capital investment and exposes the company to risks in a completely different industry (e.g., forestry management). It isn't automatically a superior strategy.
  • Industry-Specific Nature: The importance of raw material costs varies dramatically by industry. It is a life-or-death metric for a steel manufacturer or an airline but is almost irrelevant for a software company like Microsoft. Comparing this metric across different sectors is a classic apples-to-oranges mistake.

1)
Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) and First-In, First-Out (FIFO) are accounting methods used to value inventory. During inflationary periods, the method a company uses can significantly affect its reported COGS and profits.