fixed_asset_turnover_ratio [CapiPedia]

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio ======
The Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio is a key efficiency metric that reveals how well a company uses its long-term assets to generate sales. Think of a pizza shop. Its most important [[fixed assets|fixed asset]] is the oven. This ratio tells you how much pizza revenue the shop generates for every dollar invested in that oven. A busy shop selling lots of pizzas from a single, efficient oven will have a high ratio, while a quiet shop with an expensive, underused oven will have a low one. For investors, it’s a powerful tool to gauge a company’s operational performance. A high ratio suggests management is squeezing maximum value from its machinery, buildings, and equipment. A low ratio might signal inefficiency, aging assets, or poor capital allocation—all potential red flags for a discerning [[value investor]]. It essentially answers the question: //How hard are the company's core physical assets working?//
===== How It's Calculated =====
Calculating the ratio is straightforward. The formula is:
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio = [[Net Sales]] / [[Average Fixed Assets]]
Let's break down the components:
  * **Net Sales:** This is the company’s total revenue after subtracting returns, allowances, and discounts. You'll find this number at the top of the [[income statement]].
  * **Average Fixed Assets:** Fixed assets are the long-term, tangible workhorses of a business, like [[Property, Plant, and Equipment (PP&E)]]. We use an //average// to get a more balanced view of the assets the company used throughout the year. A huge asset purchase right before year-end would otherwise skew the result. To calculate it, you take the fixed asset value from the beginning of the period, add the value at the end of the period, and divide by two. Both these numbers are found on the company’s [[balance sheet]].
===== Interpreting the Ratio - What's a 'Good' Number? =====
Generally, **a higher ratio is better**. It signals superior efficiency. However, 'good' is entirely relative and only makes sense in context.
==== Comparing Across Industries ====
You can't compare apples to oranges. A software company, which needs little more than laptops and a server room, will naturally have a much higher fixed asset turnover than a capital-intensive automaker with massive factories. For example, a tech giant might have a ratio of 10, while a heavy manufacturer might have a ratio of 2. Both could be best-in-class for their respective sectors. The key is to compare a company's ratio against its direct competitors.
==== Analyzing the Trend ====
For a value investor, the historical trend is often more revealing than a single number. Is the ratio for a company consistently improving over the last five years? That's a great sign of increasing [[capital efficiency]]. Is it steadily declining? This could be a warning that the company's competitive edge is eroding or that management is making poor investment decisions in new assets.
===== A Value Investor's Perspective =====
Value investors, in the spirit of [[Warren Buffett]], are obsessed with how effectively a company's management allocates capital. The Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio is a direct window into this.
  * **Spotting Red Flags:** A chronically low or falling ratio can be a major red flag. It might suggest that the company is saddled with old, unproductive machinery or that recent large [[capital expenditures (CapEx)]] are not yet generating the expected sales. This inefficiency eats into profitability and ultimately hurts the [[Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)]], a cornerstone metric for many value investors.
  * **Finding Opportunities:** Conversely, a company with a history of a low ratio that begins to tick upwards could signal a turnaround. Perhaps new management is selling off unproductive factories or investing in more efficient technology. If the market hasn't noticed this improvement yet, it could present a classic value opportunity.
===== Limitations and Pitfalls =====
Like any single metric, this ratio shouldn't be used in isolation. Keep these pitfalls in mind:
  * **Depreciation Games:** An older company with heavily [[depreciated]] assets might show an artificially high ratio because the asset value on its books (the denominator) is very low. This can be misleading, as the company may be facing massive new CapEx just to stay in business.
  * **The Rise of Leasing:** Companies that lease a significant portion of their assets (like many retailers or airlines) instead of owning them will have fewer fixed assets on their balance sheet. This can make their turnover ratio look fantastic compared to a competitor that owns its assets. Always check the financial statement footnotes for details on leasing arrangements.
  * **Service vs. Manufacturing:** The ratio is most useful for asset-heavy industries like manufacturing, utilities, and transportation. It’s far less relevant for service-based or tech companies whose primary assets are intangible (like brand names or patents), which don't show up in the 'fixed assets' line item.