A Moonshot Project is a highly ambitious, exploratory, and groundbreaking project undertaken by a company without any immediate expectation of short-term profitability or a clear path to commercial success. The term, inspired by the audacious goal of the 1960s Apollo 11 mission to land a man on the moon, perfectly captures the essence of these ventures: they aim for a giant leap forward, not an incremental improvement. Think of self-driving cars, drone delivery services, or finding cures for aging. These projects are characterized by immense technological uncertainty and a high risk of failure. For a company, a moonshot is a long-term bet on the future, one that consumes significant capital and resources for years, or even decades. While the potential payoff can be astronomical, transforming an industry or creating a new one entirely, the journey is fraught with peril, making it a fascinating and often challenging subject for investors to evaluate.
Moonshots aren't just big projects; they have a specific DNA. They typically share several key characteristics:
For a disciple of value investing, the term 'moonshot' can set off alarm bells. After all, we're taught to buy businesses we can understand and value, not to speculate on futuristic dreams. So, how should a prudent investor think about a company pouring billions into what looks like a corporate science fair?
On the surface, moonshot projects are the antithesis of a classic value investment. They are, by definition, speculative. The legendary Benjamin Graham drew a firm line between investment and speculation, defining an investment operation as one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and an adequate return. Moonshot projects often fail this test spectacularly.
This is a classic trap. An investor might see a company's stock price fall due to mounting losses from its moonshot division and think it's getting cheap, only to find the core business isn't strong enough to sustain the cash burn, leading to further losses.
Despite the risks, ignoring moonshots entirely can mean missing the bigger picture. The key is to analyze the company with a 'two-part brain': one part focused on the stable, profitable core business, and the other on the speculative ventures.
First, put the moonshots in a box and set them aside. Analyze the main business as a standalone entity. Does it have a durable economic moat? Is it highly profitable and generating strong, predictable cash flows? Does it have a fortress-like balance sheet with little debt? If the answer to these questions is 'yes', then the company can afford to dabble in moonshots. The profits from the core engine are funding the experiments.
Once you've valued the core business, you have two smart ways to think about the moonshot portfolio:
Don't buy the hype, buy the business. A company's moonshot projects are exciting, but they are not a reason to invest. Instead, view them as an outcome of a fantastic core business that gushes so much cash it can afford to shoot for the moon. If you can buy that core business at a reasonable price, the moonshots become a free source of massive potential upside. The ultimate value play is getting a portfolio of world-changing options without having to pay for them.