Investment Managers are the professional pilots of the financial world. They are individuals or firms entrusted with managing a collection of investments—a portfolio—on behalf of their clients, which can range from individuals like you to massive institutions. Their primary job is to make investment decisions to meet specific financial goals, whether that's steady income for a retiree or aggressive growth for a university endowment. They don’t just pick stocks for fun; they are fiduciaries (or at least, they should be), meaning they have a legal and ethical duty to act in their clients' best interest. In exchange for their expertise and service, they charge fees, a critical detail that every investor must scrutinize. At their best, they are skilled stewards of capital; at their worst, they are expensive underperformers who enrich themselves more than their clients.
The day-to-day life of an investment manager isn't always the high-octane drama depicted in movies. It’s a disciplined process that generally involves four key activities:
Not all investment managers are cut from the same cloth. They can be broadly categorized by their investment style, which dramatically affects their strategy, cost, and likely performance.
This is the single most important distinction for an ordinary investor to understand.
Most retail investors access professional management through pooled vehicles like a mutual fund or ETF. When you buy shares in one of these funds, you are hiring its manager. Large institutional clients, like pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds, often have enough capital to hire investment management firms directly to manage bespoke portfolios.
From a value investing perspective, the question of whether to hire an active investment manager is fraught with skepticism. While the idea of handing your money to an expert is appealing, the reality is often disappointing.
Fees are the silent killer of investment returns. An active manager's fee might seem small—say, 1% to 2% per year—but the effect of compounding makes it a formidable obstacle. A 2% annual fee on a portfolio that earns 7% per year doesn't just reduce your return to 5%; over 30 years, it can consume more than half of your potential ending wealth. More exotic managers, like those at hedge funds, often charge a “two and twenty” fee (a 2% management fee plus 20% of profits), creating an even higher bar to clear.
Decades of data show a clear and consistent trend: most active managers fail to beat their passive benchmarks, especially after their fees are deducted. While a few brilliant managers do exist, identifying them in advance is nearly impossible. For every Warren Buffett, there are hundreds of overconfident, and overpaid, managers who deliver mediocre results.
For the majority of ordinary investors, the most sensible path is to become a passive investor. As Warren Buffett himself has repeatedly advised, a low-cost S&P 500 index fund is the best investment most people can make. It guarantees you the market's return minus a tiny fee. If you are determined to seek active management, do so with extreme prejudice.