The Historical Cost Principle (also known as the 'cost principle') is a cornerstone accounting principle dictating that companies must record their assets on the balance sheet at their original, nominal purchase price. This “historical cost” is the cash amount, or its equivalent, paid to acquire the asset. Once recorded, this value generally remains unchanged on the financial statements, even if the asset's market value skyrockets or plummets over time. For example, a piece of land bought for $50,000 in 1980 is still carried on the books at $50,000 today, regardless of its current billion-dollar valuation. The rationale behind this principle is to ensure that financial reporting is objective and verifiable. A purchase price is a cold, hard fact backed by invoices and contracts, which prevents companies from subjectively marking up asset values to artificially inflate their net worth. While this approach promotes consistency, it can create a distorted picture of a company's true economic reality, a distortion that savvy investors can use to their advantage.
The historical cost principle is loved by accountants for its reliability but can be a major headache—or a golden opportunity—for investors. It’s a classic case of sacrificing relevance for the sake of objectivity.
Imagine a world without this rule. Company managers could revalue their headquarters, machinery, or brand names whenever they felt like it, perhaps right before trying to secure a big loan or attract new investors. Financial statements would become works of fiction, based on optimistic appraisals rather than verifiable transactions. The historical cost principle acts as a safeguard against such manipulation. By anchoring asset values to their original purchase price, it ensures that the balance sheet is based on facts, not feelings. This creates a consistent and comparable baseline for analyzing a company's financial history.
The major drawback is that over time, especially in an inflationary environment, historical costs become increasingly irrelevant. A balance sheet prepared under this principle is a snapshot of the past, not a reflection of current economic value. It systematically understates the true worth of assets that have appreciated significantly. This gap between the recorded book value and the real-world market value is precisely where value investing practitioners, inspired by legends like Benjamin Graham, find fertile ground for discovery. For a value investor, a company's balance sheet isn't the final word on its value; it's the starting point of an investigation.
For a value investor, the historical cost principle is a feature, not a bug. It can mask a company's true worth, creating opportunities to buy assets for far less than they are actually worth.
The most obvious place this occurs is with real estate.
This principle also applies to other assets:
When you analyze a company, use the historical cost principle as a treasure map: