Confirmation, in the investment world, is the practice of seeking additional evidence to support an initial conclusion or signal. Think of it as getting a “second opinion” for your investment idea. For a technical analyst glued to charts, this might mean one indicator backing up another's signal to buy or sell. For a value investor poring over financial statements, it’s about finding real-world events or data that prove their underlying investment thesis is on track. While seemingly a prudent step, the quest for confirmation is a double-edged sword. It can provide a crucial layer of security and reduce the odds of acting on a false signal. However, it can also lead investors straight into the psychological trap of confirmation bias, where they only see what they want to see, ignoring evidence that contradicts their brilliant (or not-so-brilliant) idea. Understanding this duality is key to using confirmation as a tool, not a crutch.
The idea of “confirmation” means slightly different things depending on which investment camp you're in. While both seek validation, how they find it and what they're validating are worlds apart.
For those who believe a stock's history is written in its price chart, confirmation is all about validating a pattern or trend. A technical signal on its own is just a hint; a confirmed signal is one that's much harder to ignore. The goal is to avoid “whipsaws”—getting into a trade on a false signal only to have the price immediately reverse. How do they do it? By looking for agreement between different tools and indicators.
A value investor, grounded in the principles of Benjamin Graham, couldn't care less about chart squiggles. Their confirmation comes not from the market's mood swings, but from the real world of business and finance. Their “signal” is the conclusion of their fundamental analysis—that a company is trading for less than its intrinsic value. Confirmation, then, is any evidence that their analysis is correct and that the company's value is being unlocked. This type of confirmation is a slow-burn, unfolding over quarters or even years.
Here's the big, flashing warning sign. Our brains are wired to seek agreement. This psychological shortcut, known as confirmation bias, is one of the most destructive forces in investing. It’s the tendency to actively search for, interpret, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values. It doesn't matter if you're a value investor or a technical analyst; this bias will find you.
So, how do you get a “second opinion” without just hearing your own voice echoed back?
Ultimately, genuine confirmation strengthens an investment case. But confirmation born of bias is just a comforting lie you tell yourself before losing money.